Business and Finance Help. Essential Strategies That Will Transform Your Academic SuccessNavigating the complex global of organization and finance requires whole business employer and finance help to make certain educational excellence. Students pursuing degrees in those demanding fields often locate themselves overwhelmed by the usage of elaborate standards, difficult coursework, and rigorous analytical requirements.
Academic institutions understand that business enterprise and finance help is vital for pupil success. The multifaceted nature of monetary markets, corporate techniques, and financial standards needs specialised guidance. When university college students are looking for organisation and finance help, they’re making an investment of their expert improvement and educational fulfillment.
Effective industrial organisation and finance help encompasses diverse educational disciplines, which include accounting, economics, funding evaluation, and organization finance. Students who employ expert commercial enterprise organisation and finance help offerings show better instructional common performance and deeper conceptual understanding.
At http://studycreek.com, we provide excellent commercial enterprise and finance assist tailored to man or woman student wishes. Our platform gives comprehensive business and finance help that covers fundamental standards through superior theoretical programs.
Professional business and finance help includes assignment assistance, research guidance, and analytical support. Students accessing quality business and finance help develop critical thinking skills essential for career advancement. The structured approach of our business and finance help ensures students grasp complex financial principles effectively.
Quality business and finance help involves thorough research methodologies and analytical techniques. Students requiring business and finance help advantage from expert guidance in information interpretation, financial modeling, and marketplace analysis. Our business and finance help offerings combine theoretical expertise with realistic applications.
For additional research resources, students can explore comprehensive academic materials at http://dissertationhive.com, which enhances our business and finance help services.
Professional business and finance help extends past immediately educational necessities. Students who consistently make use of business and finance help broaden know-how that translates into career possibilities. The basis established thru great business and finance help supports lifelong studying and professional increase.
Investing in comprehensive business and finance help represents a strategic choice for academic and professional success. Students who prioritize business and finance help role themselves advantageously in competitive markets.
Exceptional business and finance help transforms educational challenges into possibilities for boom and studying. Students in search of dependable business and finance help can reap their instructional dreams thru committed support and professional guidance. Visit http://studycreek.com today to discover how our specialized business and finance help can increase your educational overall performance and put together you for professional excellence.
In the previous assessment, you did some significant critical thinking with more straightforward writing. For this assessment, you will do even more critical thinking and analysis. Then you will present your ideas in a scholarly manner, meaning a more detailed narrative. You can assume your audience consists of people with advanced training who expect to understand your analysis in depth so they can critique it. You will do this in the format of a literature review.
The purpose of this literature review is to demonstrate that your proposed capstone topic makes sense in light of current research findings. That is how doctoral-level professionals use the research literature: they start with an idea, discover what is currently known about the topic, and then refine their idea to incorporate those findings.
So let’s say you presented your proposal to the organization where you would like to conduct your capstone project, and they agreed! Now you must submit a formal literature review for your Capella class to justify the topic to your instructor. While professionals tend to want the highlights of the key points, academics want all the details so they can critically evaluate your work. This is a scholarly paper.
You can use the 10 articles that you located for earlier assessments. For this paper, however, you should add in a scholarly theory that helps make sense of the research.
Your paper should include:
In your paper:
Student Name
Course
Date
Employee Engagement as a Mediator of Leadership Effectiveness and Organizational Performance: A Literature Review and Proposed Intervention
Introduction
The dating among management practices and organizational results has been a vital cognizance of organizational studies for many years. However, the mechanisms thru which powerful management interprets into progressed organizational overall performance remain complex and multifaceted. Employee engagement has emerged as a important mediating variable that may give an explanation for how leadership behaviors influence organizational outcomes together with productivity, retention, and monetary performance (Kahn, 1990; Schaufeli
The problem addressed on this literature evaluate facilities on the distance between theoretical expertise of employee engagement and realistic implementation of engagement-enhancing management practices in organizational settings. While large studies has installed the superb correlation among worker engagement and numerous organizational consequences, much less attention has been paid to identifying particular, proof-primarily based management interventions that may systematically enhance engagement ranges. This hole is especially said in mid-sized agencies (one hundred-500 employees) where resources for complete management development packages may be constrained, but the want for powerful engagement techniques stays important.
Furthermore, current studies frequently treats employee engagement as a unidimensional construct, failing to account for the nuanced methods distinctive components of engagement (cognitive, emotional, and behavioral) might also reply in a different way to numerous management techniques. This oversimplification limits the realistic software of studies findings for organizational leaders in search of to implement focused interventions.
The reason of this literature overview is to synthesize modern studies on the connection among leadership practices and worker engagement, observe how this dating influences organizational performance, and discover evidence-based tactics for developing management interventions that could beautify worker engagement in organizational settings. This evaluation will inform the development of a comprehensive management improvement program designed to enhance employee engagement and, consequently, organizational overall performance results.
Literature Review
The Conceptual Foundation of Employee Engagement
Employee engagement, as conceptualized in present day organizational psychology, represents a multidimensional assemble encompassing cognitive, emotional, and behavioral dimensions of employee involvement with their paintings and employer. Kahn’s (1990) seminal paintings described private engagement as “the harnessing of business enterprise individuals’ selves to their paintings roles” (p. 694), setting up engagement as a nation in which employees convey their complete selves to their work experiences. This foundational definition has been subtle and multiplied by way of subsequent researchers, with Schaufeli and Bakker (2004) operationalizing engagement via three middle dimensions: vigour (high electricity and intellectual resilience), determination (excessive involvement and sense of significance), and absorption (full attention and happy engrossment).
As engagement theory has evolved, there are significant differences between engagement and other related constructs like job satisfaction level, organizational commitment, and motivation. While job satisfaction is characterized by an evaluation-focused attitude towards work, engagement encompasses both behavioral and attitudinal elements, suggesting a more active and dynamic state of involvement (Rich. This distinction is significant in comprehending why the use of traditional methods to enhance job satisfaction may not necessarily result in greater engagement.
A robust relationship between employee participation and various individual and organizational outcomes has been demonstrated by recent meta-analytic findings. In their study, Harter (1999) found that the top quarter of business units (Hirketts & Sons, 2002) had higher customer metrics (12%), higher productivity (18%) and better safety outcomes than the quarter in which the most engaged business unit was located. Over time, these results have been repeated and expanded upon, with effect sizes remained stable across different industries/organizations (Gallup; 2020).)
The way engagement is measured or interpreted remains unchanged.’ According to Bakker and Albrecht (2018), engagement should be viewed as more dynamic, with levels of engagement differing among people over time and in different environments. Why do they suggest this? The view goes beyond traditional conceptualizations of engagement as a trait, instead proposing that organizational interventions may have to consider temporal variation in engagement experiences.[N 20].
Leadership Practices and Employee Engagement.
The correlation between leadership behaviors and employee engagement has been extensively studied, and transformational leadership has emerged as one of the most predictive leadership styles for engagement outcomes. Through the use of idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualized consideration, Bass and Riggio (2006) model of transformational leadership has shown strong empirical evidence for its connection to engagement across different organizational contexts.
Various channels are utilized by transformational leaders to encourage engagement. An idealized component of influence fosters trust and respect, which in turn encourages employees to feel secure with organizational direction. Motivational triggers help employees connect their personal giving to more meaningful organizational goals and engage in the dedicated aspect of work. “. Intellectual stimulation can foster innovative problem-solving and cognitive development, potentially enhancing the cognitive aspects of engagement. Additionally (Avolio, Walumbwa, & Weber 2009) employee development needs are acknowledged through careful consideration. How does this work?
Employee engagement has also been linked to authentic leadership. Effective leaders, as noted by Walumbwa, Avolio, Gardner, Wernsing, and Peterson (2008), are those who possess the qualities of self-awareness/relational transparency/moral perspective in creating psychological conditions that foster engagement. In modern organizational settings, where trust and credibility are becoming more valuable, the transparency and consistency of true leadership may be particularly important.
Servant leadership represents a third leadership approach with documented relationships to employee engagement. Van Dierendonck and Patterson (2010) argue that servant leaders, who emphasize follower development and well-being, create conditions that foster both intrinsic motivation and engagement. Employer development and empowerment, which are hallmarks of servant leadership, can be especially effective in fostering the energy and commitment that go with engagement.
Despite differences in leadership styles, the correlation between leadership and engagement is not always favorable. The outcomes of research on transactional leadership have been mixed, with some findings indicating that relationships between individuals and groups can improve under certain circumstances, while others suggest that pure transaction models may not be sufficient for maintaining high levels of engagement in the long term (Judge & Piccolo, 2004).
Mediating Mechanisms and Psychological Processes.
It’s crucial to comprehend the psychological mechanisms that govern employee engagement in order to understand how leadership practices affect this relationship.Self-Determination Theory is a usually good framework to comprehend these processes. It is based upon a model of motivation and well-being stating that satisfaction of three specific psychological needs—autonomy, competence, or relatedness—is essential for an individual (Deci & Ryan 2000).
Certain leadership styles support autonomy by allowing decision-making, initiative-based work, or very little supervision, and that in fact, increases intrinsic motivation and engagement.
Competence is being developed through the leadership function; leadership means providing areas for competent working with the appropriate challenges for further improvement, constructive criticism, and the occasion for every person to develop his/her skills. The conditions for engagement through mastery experiences are created by leaders who effectively balance task demands with employee capabilities and provide necessary resources and support. According to Bakker & Demerouti’s Job Demand in 2017: “A job demand—resources—almost always depend on the balance between demands and resources, where optimal balance leads to engagement; low ideal results to engage but ultimately lead to burnout.
Relatedness is a important component of SDT, and it encompasses the feeling that humans within the place of work have empathy closer to and take care of others. The satisfaction of relatedness wishes is undoubtedly impacted with the aid of management behaviors that emphasize actual difficulty for worker nicely-being, create inclusive environments, and sell superb relationships amongst humans. The Leader-Member Exchange theory has consistently emphasized the correlation between leader-member relationships and engagement outcomes (Graen & Uhl-Bien, 1995).
A recent study has revealed that psychological safety is a significant mediator between leadership and engagement.
Organizational Context and Engagement Outcomes.
The relationship between leadership and engagement varies depending on the context within the organization.edu. Leadership practices have the potential to either increase or decrease engagement, depending on the organizational culture, structure, and climate. According to Schein and Scheiner (2017), the framework of organizational culture is comprised of assumptions about human nature, relationships, and organizational purpose, which have significant influence on leadership behaviors.
A look at has discovered that the extent of alignment between leadership practices and organizational subculture can effect engagement ranges. In cultures in which innovation and threat-taking are valued, management patterns that promote experimentation can be more powerful than those wherein stability and blunders avoidance are prioritized (Cameron
Organizational structure also affects the relationship between leadership and engagement. Effective leadership practices based on engagement can be enhanced by improving communication between leaders and employees, which is possible in flat organizational settings. However, hierarchical structures can hinder real connections between leaders and employees while restricting the influence of leadership behaviors on engagement (Spreitzer 1997). Why is this so? However,
Additional variables, like the size of the enterprise, are also significant. The role of “leadership talent”. Research indicates that mid-sized organizations are confronted with distinct challenges, as they may not have access to the resources necessary for comprehensive leadership development programs available to larger organizations while facing more challenging leadership than smaller organizations (Baron & Hannan, 2002).
Measurement and Assessment of Engagement.
For both research and practical purposes, it is important to accurately measure employee engagement. Despite the advancements, Schaufeli and Bakker (2003) have not abandoned the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) as an essential tool for measuring engagement. The UWES evaluates 17 items to determine the three dimensions of engagement (enthousy, steadfastness, and comprehension), with shorter items provided for practical considerations.
However, there are questions about whether engagement measures have a discriminating value—in that they cannot be taken apart from related constructs such as job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Some scientists have advocated for more comprehensive measurement methods that reflect the fluctuating nature of engagement and its impact over time and in certain contexts (Bakker & Albrecht, 2018).
The Gallup Q12 presents an alternative method of measuring engagement, utilizing relevant workplace factors to forecast engagement outcomes.
Despite the strong predictive validity of the Q12 for organizational outcomes, some researchers are uncertain about its significance in measuring engagement per se or the antecedents of engagement (Macey & Schneider, 2008).
The use of experience sampling methods and ecological momentary assessment has led to the measurement of real-time fluctuations in engagement. These methods offer a more detailed understanding of how engagement differs across time periods and contexts, providing insights that may not be conveyed by standard survey techniques (Bakker&Albrecht, 2018).
Theory
Learning Self-Determination Theory for Leadership and Engagement.
Self-Determination Theory (SDT), developed by Edward Deci and Richard Ryan, is a comprehensive theoretical framework that explores how leadership practices affect employee engagement. It provides an explanation for this phenomenon. According to SDT, humans have three fundamental psychological prerequisites: autonomy, competence or being related…. Deci & Ryan 2000 found that satisfying these needs is also important for intrinsic motivation, psychological well-being and optimal functioning.[M].
The need for autonomy is to have the capacity to make choices and follow their own path…. In organizational settings, autonomy is promoted as employees have the ability to choose how they are supposed to work, feel that their actions are self-reliant, and experience psychological freedom rather than external interference. The sense of competence is characterized by the ability to feel effective and capable of accomplishing objectives. The promotion of competence is based on the use of optimal challenges, positive reinforcement, and opportunities for mastery and development. In one’s social context, relatedness involves the desire to feel connected with others, to be cherished, and to have someone provide comfort.
SDT divides motivation into different types, ranging from intrinsic motivation (focusing on intrinsic satisfaction) to extrinsic motivation that produces separate outcomes. This theory posits that motivation can be more independent when satisfied with something, and that it can also suggest that frustration when fulfilled can lead to motivation or amotivation controlled by the mind. Employee engagement can be understood through the use of this theoretical framework, which recognizes it as a state of autonomous motivation towards work activities.
SDT application in Leadership and Engagement Research.
The application of SDT to the literature on leadership engagement reveals several important lessons.'”. Engagement is more likely to be enhanced by leadership behaviors that promote employee autonomy, competence and relatedness rather than those that undermine these needs. The definition of transformational leadership involves a leadership approach that serves the three fundamental needs in achieving success. By creating emotional connections between leaders and followers, idealized influence and inspirational motivation support a stronger connection between work and meaningful purposes. Cognitive stimulation fosters competence through learning and development, while individualized consideration fostere autonomy by responding to the needs and preferences of the employee.
Research has shown that leadership behaviors and engagement outcomes are mediated by need satisfaction. The relationship between transformational leadership and work engagement was partially mediated by the satisfaction with autonomy, competence, and relatedness, as noted by Van den Broeck et al. (2008). This implies that productive leaders enhance engagement not by their actions but indirectly through the establishment of conditions that satisfy basic psychological needs of employees.
While certain leadership processes may be more successful because of the SDT framework approach, any style perceived as controlling or undermining the very genuine autonomy of employees (say, micromanagement, overground monitoring, and so forth) should in essence induce the frustration of basic needs and employee engagement even when the leadership style might still have other positive characteristics. Another leadership behavior might frustrate the need for competence by setting either unreasonably high standards or insufficiently supportive ones. This precludes any privileged level of engagement and rather encourages stress and disengagement.
Impacts on Leadership Development and Intervention Design.
The design of leadership development interventions to increase employee engagement is subject to SDT’s specific recommendations. Additionally, Instead of focusing on leadership behaviors, interventions should focus on helping leaders understand and provide support for their employees’ fundamental psychological needs. The objective is to enhance leaders’ abilities in multiple crucial domains:
Self-supportive leadership entails developing the potential to justify choices and requests, provide flexibility and desire where feasible, recognize worker views and emotions, at the same time as downplaying influenceful language and conduct. Leaders can be trained to perceive when their communique technique is taken into consideration controlling and to plot alternative methods that preserve employee participation at the same time
as attaining organizational dreams.
Competence-helping management includes the mastery of giving positive feedback, presenting suitable demanding situations, and nurturing boom in personnel. It involves studying a way to assign project duties matching the skills of an employee, assisting them with essential help and resources, and presenting opportunities for development leading in the direction of proficiency and mastery.
Generally, courting-oriented leadership centers on nurturing actual care and problem for employees as human beings, developing embracing environments wherein all employees feel worthy of connection, and fostering harmony among teams. It can also consist of the enhancement of a frontrunner’s emotional and social abilties, as well as ensuring the psychological safety of his or her groups.
Engaging in the most effective way is dependent on the organizational context where leadership takes place, as per the SDT framework. Organizational policies, procedures, and culture can both aid and inhibit leaders in meeting employee demands.’ In addition to individual leadership behaviors, interventions for comprehensive engagement may need to address systemic organizational factors. “.
Project Proposal
Overview and Rationale
Based at the literature assessment and theoretical analysis, I propose growing and imposing a complete Leadership Development Program for Employee Engagement (LDPEE) designed particularly for mid-sized groups. This software will combine SDT ideas with proof-primarily based management practices to systematically enhance leaders’ abilities in fostering worker engagement.
The proposed mission addresses the diagnosed gap among theoretical understanding of worker engagement and realistic implementation of engagement-improving management practices. While existing research has set up the importance of employee engagement for organizational consequences, fewer research have evolved and examined complete, principle-based interventions that may be almost applied in organizational settings.
The application will consist of three included additives: (1) leader evaluation and remarks, (2) ability development workshops, and (three) ongoing education and guide. This multi-modal method is designed to address one of a kind elements of management improvement and to offer sustained aid for behavior alternate. The application may be implemented over a 12-month duration to permit for ability development, practice, and reinforcement.
Program Components
Component 1: Leader Assessment and Feedback The software will begin with comprehensive evaluation of participating leaders’ modern practices related to autonomy, competence, and relatedness aid. This will encompass 360-degree feedback incorporating perspectives from direct reports, friends, and supervisors, in addition to self-assessment the use of verified contraptions. The assessment will provide baseline data for program evaluation and customized feedback to guide person development planning.
Component 2: Skill Development Workshops The center of the program includes six half of-day workshops added over six months.
Each workshop will focus on specific leadership capabilities related to need satisfaction:
• Workshop 1: Understanding Employee Engagement and SDT
• Workshop 2: Autonomy-Supportive Leadership
• Workshop 3: Competence-Supportive Leadership
• Workshop 4: Relatedness-Supportive Leadership
• Workshop five: Integrating Need-Supportive Practices
• Workshop 6: Sustaining Engagement in Challenging Times
Each workshop will combine theoretical content with practical sports, case research, and talent practice. Participants will expand individual motion plans and exercise new behaviors between classes.
Component three: Ongoing Coaching and Support To aid conduct change and ability transfer, this system will consist of month-to-month character coaching sessions and peer mastering corporations. Coaches will help leaders follow new abilities in their precise contexts, address implementation challenges, and hold motivation for endured development.
Evaluation Plan
The application may be evaluated the usage of a quasi-experimental layout with pre-post measurements and a contrast institution. Primary outcomes will consist of changes in employee engagement (measured using the UWES), employee perceptions of leader need help, and organizational overall performance indicators such as turnover, absenteeism, and productivity metrics.
Secondary outcomes will consist of chief self-efficacy for engagement-supportive behaviors, chief properly-being, and group psychological safety. Data will be collected at baseline, without delay submit-program, and at 6-month comply with-up to assess both immediate and sustained results.
Expected Outcomes and Organizational Impact
Based on the reviewed literature, I expect that the LDPEE program will result in full-size enhancements in worker engagement scores, with impact sizes corresponding to those said in previous leadership improvement research (d = zero.4 to zero.6). The application is likewise predicted to enhance worker perceptions of supervisor help and to reduce turnover intentions.
The organizational effect should consist of progressed retention fees, accelerated productivity, and more suitable organizational weather. The consciousness on mid-sized corporations ensures that this system addresses the precise wishes and constraints of this underserved organizational section whilst supplying a version that may be adapted for different organizational contexts.
The program will contribute to the literature by providing empirical evidence for the effectiveness of SDT-based leadership development interventions and by demonstrating practical approaches for implementing engagement-focused leadership development in organizational settings.
Conclusion
This evaluation has compiled contemporary research on the relationship between leadership practices and employee engagement, imparting a comprehensive evaluate of each theoretical elements as well as sensible implications for companies. The proof indicates that employee engagement is a vital link between leadership effectiveness and organizational performance, as engaged employees are more likely to growth productiveness, retention, and make a contribution to organizational fulfillment.
The assessment has emphasised the effectiveness of transformational, actual, and servant leadership strategies in motivating personnel at the same time as also investigating the psychological mechanisms at the back of those techniques.
Self-Determination Theory offers a strong conceptual foundation for understanding these mechanisms, emphasizing the need to satisfy employee basic needs such as autonomy and competence or relatedness.
Many important themes are revealed by this analysis. The correlation among management and engagement is multifaceted and prompted via various psychological and organizational elements. Leadership interventions have to now not completely concentrate on surface-level behaviors, but rather include them to mediate external elements and sell effective management. Leadership practices may be prompted by using the organizational context, because of this that engagement initiatives ought to be tailored to particular organizational cultures and structures. As a third point, the size and assessment of engagement are constantly converting, with new techniques offering more particular records approximately engagement as frequently interacting.
In order to address gaps in the literature, the proposed Leadership Development Program for Employee Engagement provides a theory-based intervention that can be applied practically within an organization. While the program’s focus on mid-sized organizations fills a significant gap in the literature on leadership development, it also provides A model for similar initiatives at any level which may be used elsewhere in organizational structure.
Beyond theoretical reflection, this review also addresses the practical applications of organizational theory.cfm (www.”. Leaders and organizations wishing to increase employee engagement must take a step further than simply using simplistic approaches, needing heightened understanding of the psychological processes involved. The investment in leadership development should consider not only the functions of leaders but also their impact on employee motivation and engagement. Hence, this requires interest to detail.
Research on the dynamic nature of engagement, the impact of individual differences on engagement processes, and the long-term sustainability of interventions focused on experience have to be protected in destiny research. It is likewise important to behavior research on how engagement strategies can range within extraordinary organizations, along with digital and hybrid work environments.
The synthesis produced in this review indicates that employee engagement is an essential factor for organizational effectiveness. The development of need-supportive practices in organizations can foster a sense of well-being and organizational performance by developing leaders who can consistently encourage employee engagement. This intervention provides a practical technique to translating research findings into tangible organizational enhancements, which enhances each engagement research theory and practice.
References
References
Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Present ideas and recent research. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421–449. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621
Bakker, A. B., & Albrecht, S. (2018). Work engagement: Current trends. Career Development International, 23(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-11-2017-0192
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Looking ahead with a focus on the Job Demands–Resources Theory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000106
Baron, J. N., & Hannan, M. T. (2002). Insights into the success of high-tech start-up firms. California Management Review, 44(3), 8–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166104
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2024). Job vacancies and employee turnover. U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Goals and their targets: Why human needs and decision making are important in action. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The past, present, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
Gallup. (2020). State of the Global Workplace. Gallup Press.
Gallup. (2023). State of the American Workplace. Gallup Press.
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). A meta-analysis of the relationship between employee satisfaction, engagement, and business outcomes at the business-unit level. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268
Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). A meta-analytic examination of the validity of transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287
Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. In Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x
Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job performance and engagement: Antecedents and mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468904
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES): Preliminary manual. Occupational Health Psychology Unit, Utrecht University.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, resources, and their effects on burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.236
Schein, E. H., & Schein, P. (2017). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.5465/256865
Van den Broeck, M., Vansteenkiste, M., & De Witte, H. (2008). Explaining the link between employment, burnout, and engagement: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Work & Stress, 22(3), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370802393672
Van Dierendonck, D., & Patterson, K. (2010). Servant leadership: Theories and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). The development and validation of a theory-based measure for authentic leadership. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more