Discuss the controversy. Describe how it relates to the four core ethical principles.

1

Ethics and Evidence-Based Research

1250–1500-word addressing each of the following points. There should be three main sections, one for each bullet below. Separate each section with a clear heading that allows you to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least two sources using citations. Make sure to cite using the APA writing style. The cover page and reference page in correct APA do not count towards the minimum word amount.

Part 1: Describe why ethical safeguards designed for clinical research may not be feasible or appropriate for evidence-based practice or evidence-based practice implementation projects.

Part 2:  Review the sectioned titled  Two Ethical Exemplars  in Chapter 22 of the textbook (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2015, pages 518-519). Discuss three main ethical controversies related to implementing Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI) Initiatives. Describe how these controversies relate to the four core ethical principles.

Part 3: Identify which ethical principles may conflict with the concept of “patients having an ethical responsibility in improving healthcare.” Discuss how these conflicts may be resolved.

Length: 1250 – 1500 words

Include a title page and reference page in APA format. These do not count towards the minimum word count for this. Must include an introduction and a conclusion.

Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the. A minimum of two (2) scholarly sources are required for this.

FYI: BELOW FROM PAGE 2 IS THE TEMPLATE OF HOW THE PAPER SHOULD BE WRITTEN. OUTLINE PLEASE FOLLOW. NO RUNNING HEAD. WILL ATTACH THE SCANNED PAGES. START WITH TITLE PAGE.

Ethics and Evidence-Based Research

This is where you will write out your introduction. Briefly discuss what you will be covering in this paper, which is 1) a description of why ethical safeguards designed for clinical research may not be feasible for evidence-based practice or evidence-based practice implementation projects, 2) a discussion of three main ethical controversies related to implementing evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) initiatives and how these controversies relate to the four core ethical principles, and 3) identification of which ethical principles may be in conflict with the concept of “patients having an ethical responsibility in improving healthcare” and how these conflicts may be resolved. You will need to review the Melnyk (2015) text to help with writing this paper.

Ethical Safeguards for Evidence-Based Practice

For this section, describe to readers why ethical safeguards designed for clinical research may not be feasible or appropriate for evidence-based practice or evidence-based practice implementation projects.

Ethical Controversies

In this section, introduce to the reader that you will be discussing three main ethical controversies related to implementing evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) initiatives and describing how these controversies relate to the four core ethical principles. Read pages 518-519 in Melnyk (2015) to help with this section.

Controversy One

Discuss the controversy. Describe how it relates to the four core ethical principles.

Controversy Two

Discuss the controversy. Describe how it relates to the four core ethical principles.

Controversy Three

Discuss the controversy. Describe how it relates to the four core ethical principles.

Ethical Responsibility of Patients

Here you will address if patients have an ethical responsibility in improving healthcare. Identify and discuss which ethical principles may be in conflict with the concept of “patients having an ethical responsibility in improving healthcare.” Discuss how these conflicts may be resolved.

Conclusion

Almost done! Provide a summary of your paper in three or more sentences.

References

Melnyk, B.M. (2015). Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: A guide to best practice. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.